The protocol library, browsable

Evidence grade

authority

“this is the standard approach”

n+1, 1–2 inch unscented finer/clumping, uncovered, daily scoop are the standard approach on the opened Cornell / ASPCA / Lees pages. Buffet is a named diagnostic procedure, not an RCT of treatment. Cassiday n≈9 is under-powered by their own note — practitioner method, not a trial grade. No source here gives advance criteria or a week ladder.

Indicated for

• Inadequate litter setup
• Box aversion
• Substrate aversion
• Location preference

Prerequisites

None — this is a starting protocol.

Cadence

• Sessions/day: scoop at least once daily (ASPCA); Lees once or twice daily; Bahner: you cannot scoop too often
• Days/week: every day
• Max minutes/day: not specified

Sources disagree: Full wash: ASPCA weekly complete rinse/replace vs Fear Free Lees monthly dump+wash. Cornell has no numbered wash interval. No source gives a week-by-week setup ladder.

Evidence grade

authority

“this is the standard approach”

Standard approach on opened ASPCA / Cornell / Delgado pages. ASPCA calls neuter a proven treatment for reproductive advertisement and gives no percentage. Pheromone wording is 'some effect' only — not a fail clock, not a success %. No RCT of a marking sequence was opened.

Indicated for

• Urine marking

Prerequisites

• Litter setup — n+1 boxes, place, type, substrate, cleanliness

Cadence

• Sessions/day: daily scoop; individual play in different areas; no session clock published for marking
• Days/week: every day
• Max minutes/day: not specified

Sources disagree: No source publishes a week-by-week marking ladder or a wait after neuter / Feliway. Posture as diagnosis: Cornell 'cats don't squat to spray' vs Delgado 'some cats don't fully squat when they urinate.' Household size: Cornell more-than-seven-cats likely someone sprays vs ASPCA more-than-10 invariably — that is why flag.more_than_seven_cats is a contraindication for auto-plan, not a step.

Evidence grade

authority

“this is the standard approach”

Standard approach on opened Cornell / ASPCA pages. Location-slide is the only step sequence with a source-written stop/rewind. Buffet is a named method (practitioner + small-n Cassiday); not an RCT of recovery. No % recovery after n+1 / buffet / location-slide was published on these pages.

Indicated for

• Box aversion
• Substrate aversion
• Location preference

Prerequisites

• Litter setup — n+1 boxes, place, type, substrate, cleanliness

Cadence

• Sessions/day: daily scoop; location-slide only on days the cat is still using the box in its current spot
• Days/week: every day
• Max minutes/day: not specified

Sources disagree: Full-wash weekly (ASPCA) vs monthly (Lees). No source operationalizes 'reliably uses it.' Covers in mixed dog-cat homes: Dixon vs Cornell/ASPCA/FF/Parry/Delgado.

Evidence grade

authority

“this is the standard approach”

Standard approach on opened iCatCare moving / settle-in and ASPCA moving pages. No sourced percent of cats that soil or fight after a move. No sourced day-count for fully settled beyond the 2–3 week indoor lock-in and the 24-hour anxious-not-eating vet flag.

Indicated for

• After a move

Prerequisites

None — this is a starting protocol.

Cadence

• Sessions/day: home-base confinement is continuous; litter slide one foot per day (ASPCA)
• Days/week: every day
• Max minutes/day: not specified

Sources disagree: Outdoor access after a move: iCatCare specifies at least two to three weeks indoors; ASPCA is silent (home-base then gradual rooms only).

Evidence grade

authority

“this is the standard approach”

n+1 in different locations is the iCatCare rule they mark as the formula, repeated on conflict / multi-cat / cat-friendly pages. Cornell/ASPCA match it for litter. No RCT of resource-split as a standalone cure was opened.

Indicated for

• Tension, no injury
• Resource competition
• Fear-based conflict

Prerequisites

None — this is a starting protocol.

Cadence

• Sessions/day: management is continuous; scoop trays at least twice a day (iCatCare)
• Days/week: every day
• Max minutes/day: not specified

Sources disagree: Food during visual introduction is not this protocol. Cornell + ASPCA pair food with seeing each other; iCatCare introducing says do not. Record both; do not average. Social-maturity age band: ASPCA 1–3 years vs Cornell 2–4 years.

Evidence grade

authority

“this is the standard approach”

Spine is the opened iCatCare introducing-cats sequence because it is the one with sourced observable gates. ASPCA and Cornell pages were opened and disagree on food-at-visual; they are cited as competing, not blended. No peer-reviewed head-to-head of the ladders was opened. Blais is one pair (affiliative without continual monitoring at day 29) — not a population ladder. Fisher Beyond the Gate is a different problem (gate collapse / mismatched play) and is not encoded as this protocol.

Indicated for

• Tension, no injury
• Fear-based conflict
• Resource competition

Prerequisites

• Resource map and hard management (tension, no injury)

Cadence

• Sessions/day: iCatCare: repeat supervised contact as often as possible while they stay comfortable; new/returning cat housed separately between early unsupervised sessions. No sessions-per-day number on the introducing page.
• Days/week: not specified as a weekly quota; process is behavioural, not calendar
• Max minutes/day: not specified

Sources disagree: Food/play at visual contact: iCatCare no vs ASPCA + Cornell yes. This record follows iCatCare and does not average. ASPCA mild door-crack and severe harness+food tracks, Cornell carrier+feed, and Fisher Beyond the Gate are competing sequences — not extra steps of this id. Fear Free kitten-to-adults page is thin and has no numeric criteria. Fear Free 'week to several months' is a cat–dog article and is not an intercat typicalRange.